Return to EQ index

All information in these pages is copyright (c) 1989-2003 by Roger Nichols. All rights reserved. Permission for personal reference only, and may not be reproduced by any method without written permission.


Alive At Last

 

by Roger Nichols

The Mixing


They told me that this issue was alive issue and could I please write with that in mind. First of all, I couldn't write with anything in mind if I wasn't alive, so what the hell were they talking about? Alive issue... does that mean they are going to cover issues about life in general, or life after death, or life before birth, or life after 50, or Life magazine? Oh, alive concert. Is that the opposite of a Dead concert? I guess I have wrung all I can out of that bad pun, almost.

It just so happens that as I type this column, I am one week away from finishing the mixes for the Steely Dan live album. Well, almost live. I have mentioned before that we went into the studio and "cleaned up" a few things. C'mon now, it is a Steely Dan album, and we couldn't let any afterthought recordings of raggedy-ass playing by a bunch of old farts (besides the Eagles) out into the public, now could we? Steely Dan fans have come to expect a certain quality control that could only be achieved by spending lots of money in a recording studio.

Because of the fact that we have performed some moderate "repairs" to the songs, it would probably be illegal somewhere to call the album "Steely Dan Live", even though that's how it started out. So somebody (probably Donald) came up with the idea of calling the album "Steely Dan: Alive in America". Kind of catchy, don't you think? Like how it skirts the issue?

There has never been a live ( how did that space get in there after the "a"?) Steely Dan album. In the box set there was a live version of Bodhisattva taken from a board cassette during a show from 1974. Yup, it has been 20 years since the last Steely Dan tour. We almost didn't make this album because we thought there might be problems squeezing all of the walkers and wheel chairs in behind the board. It turns out that they made us leave them out in the lounge because they didn't want us to bang up the equipment in the control room.

The Recording


Even though we have good budgets to do some of the recordings we do, I like to cheat whenever possible. The original plan was to have a recording truck come to the two shows in Houston. I knew right away that every show would automatically be better than Houston just because those were the ones we were recording. We like to record without EQ or effects, so why not just rent a 48 track digital machine and record every show without a truck? We connected the input of the machine to the direct outputs from the Yamaha PM-4000 house mixing console, set the trims once, and recorded all of the shows the same way, one microphone per channel, clean as a whistle.

This same method can be used for live recording using modular eight track machines. I know engineers who are recording tours this way. The modular machines sit out by the mixing console getting the same feed that I sent to the 48 track machine. Just press record at the start of the show, change tapes during intermission, and forget about it. With digital machines you don't have to worry about record levels as much as you would with analog machines. As long as the levels don't clip from too much level, everything is fine. If you find afterwards that the volume pedal on the organ was turned down and the track registers -40dB, you still have 56 dB to play with.

If you have the luxury of having an extra person to continuously monitor the recording, so much the better, but as long as your procedures are well organized, you can record every show of a tour with the minimum of effort and expense. Some bands have no plans to release a live album, but record every show "just in case" something great happens. I know someone else that gave each of the players a tape of a whole show with his instrument in solo. That had to deflate a few egos real quick. I told Donald Fagen that I was going to give him a tape of his vocals in solo. He said he would have me killed if I even mentioned the possibility of doing such a thing. I guess it wasn't that great of an idea after all.

The Part of the Column That Will Get Me Free Back Stage Passes


Sure, I have done some live recordings over the years. I started out in 1960 recording a band with Stuff Smith (jazz violin player) in the lounge of The Bowlium in Pomona California. After working with house mixers like Dave Kob and Tripp Khalaf, I feel as though I really know that my place is in the studio where I can always say "OOPS, sorry, can we just do that part one more time"? Live guys have to know their stuff (no pun intended, but I reserve the right to use this in the future). There is no place for error. You have 20,000 drooling fans listening to everything you are doing. If the lead guitar player comes sliding in from off stage ripping off the perfect solo and you forgot to turn up his microphone, you could be sorry that you are right in the middle of the audience with only your mixing console to protect you from the mob.

I will confess, however, that during the last two summers out on the road with Steely Dan people would come up to me to comment about the house sound. If they said it sounded great, I would smile and say "Thanks, I'm glad you enjoyed it". If they had any complaints I would say "I am just recording, that guy over there is responsible for the sound in the house", pointing vigorously toward Dave or Tripp. When someone complains to them about this live album and says "I was there and that is not the same guitar solo as on my bootleg tape", they can point the finger at me.

Not to Change The Subject


I am mixing this album through Apogee 20 bit A/D converters. Bruce Jackson at Apogee went out of his way to make sure I got one of the first production units (serial # 0002). (Bruce said that if I mentioned his name I would get another ride in his Mooney. I told him that I don't do things like that). Even with all of the rip roaring crowd and screaming guitars pushing meter segments toward the dreaded "overs", you can hear the difference between 16 bit and 20 bit. I can't wait until we get real 20 bit CDs. HDCD, UV-22 and SBM all help make 16 bit sound like 17 bits or 18 bits, but nothing compares to straight 20 bit uncompressed audio. The extra resolution just adds to the fine detail, warmth and soundstage (I have been reading The Absolute Sound). I stored the 20 bit mixes to 24 bit Sound Designer II hard disk files, and also on Tascam DA-88 using the Rane Paq Rat bit splitting box (the new Apogee AD1000 will support the PaqRat format directly). The hard disk files are backed up to EXABYTE tapes. The 16 bit mixes were converted using my 16 bit Apogee AD500 and stored on DAT and Akai DD-1000 optical disc. The Akai mixes are backed up onto CD-R. I always print the mixes to two different types of media in case there are drop-outs.

My Meter is Running


I have mentioned in the past that I hate most DAT level meters because they are so inaccurate when it comes to displaying the amount of headroom remaining. I have been using the Sony DMU-30 digital audio meter which is the same meter unit that is found in the Sony PCM-1630. I recently discovered the DDD-603 digital meter from Mytek. It performs the same function as the Sony meter with some welcome additions. Besides the regular peak hold mode and fine resolution for accurate level setting, the DDD-603 can be set to show analog ballistics and peak levels at the same time. There are also two modes for over display. In one mode a numeric display shows the number of times an over was triggered. In the other mode, the display shows the number of samples that exceeded the over limit during each excursion. The meter is also less than half the price of the Sony DMU-30. For mixing final masters, a high quality digital domain meter is a must.

As we close, I want to leave you with a few words. How do you spell: HDCD UV-22 CD-R Exabyte SBM BMW Bruce My spelling checker couldn't figure it out. Oh yes, can you correctly pronounce the word "Houston"?




Return to EQ index